<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SubmitEdge SEO News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.submitedge.com/news/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.submitedge.com/news</link>
	<description>SEO News Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on URLs Not Indexed by Google - Page Rank Drops to Nothing by PreisJaeger.at</title>
		<link>http://www.submitedge.com/news/urls-not-indexed-by-google-page-rank-drops-to-nothing/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>PreisJaeger.at</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.submitedge.com/news/?p=44#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Hello guys,
i still have the problem that the posts of my blog (preisjaeger.at) are not indexed by google. 5 days ago everthing worked fine.

My question:
What do you think how long does it take, that google starts indexing my posts again, when i finished cleaning up all knowing duplicate-content-sources???

Thanks 4 your infromative post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello guys,<br />
i still have the problem that the posts of my blog (preisjaeger.at) are not indexed by google. 5 days ago everthing worked fine.</p>
<p>My question:<br />
What do you think how long does it take, that google starts indexing my posts again, when i finished cleaning up all knowing duplicate-content-sources???</p>
<p>Thanks 4 your infromative post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yahoo Google Partnership Announced by Schanie</title>
		<link>http://www.submitedge.com/news/yahoo-google-partnership-announced/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Schanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.submitedge.com/news/?p=42#comment-65</guid>
		<description>This is the beginning of the second evolution of search engine markets. The race for commercial tie-ups will hopefully also speed up the race for developing better search technologies.

Like Microsoft foreclosed the OS market, Google-Yahoo tieup should not discourage development of search technologies &#38; methodologies in the coming years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the beginning of the second evolution of search engine markets. The race for commercial tie-ups will hopefully also speed up the race for developing better search technologies.</p>
<p>Like Microsoft foreclosed the OS market, Google-Yahoo tieup should not discourage development of search technologies &amp; methodologies in the coming years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google -Hoo? by Sue Elvins</title>
		<link>http://www.submitedge.com/news/google-hoo/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue Elvins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.submitedge.com/news/?p=5#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Interesting. This is the first I've heard about Google wanting any parts of Yahoo but it doesn't surprise me to say the least. I read an article yesterday after seeing information on the national news regarding someone wanting to do a proxy bid on Yahoo's board to force them all out then be replaced. 

The information I gathered from it was someone by the name of Carl Icahn (sp?) who wanted this to move forward so Microsoft could begin a legal take over. Microsoft has never returned further interest in Yahoo. Here is the link I am referring to:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#38;sid=azCRCdbMyT3E&#38;refer=home</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. This is the first I&#8217;ve heard about Google wanting any parts of Yahoo but it doesn&#8217;t surprise me to say the least. I read an article yesterday after seeing information on the national news regarding someone wanting to do a proxy bid on Yahoo&#8217;s board to force them all out then be replaced. </p>
<p>The information I gathered from it was someone by the name of Carl Icahn (sp?) who wanted this to move forward so Microsoft could begin a legal take over. Microsoft has never returned further interest in Yahoo. Here is the link I am referring to:<br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=azCRCdbMyT3E&amp;refer=home" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=azCRCdbMyT3E&amp;refer=home</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Penalty from Google? by sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.submitedge.com/news/new-penalty-from-google/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 16:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.submitedge.com/news/?p=14#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Exactly, Jaksha. We all win when everyone plays fair! Google has a great team and they provide all the tools we need to succeed in honest marketing of our products, services or ideas, and I was pleased to see that they are looking out for my best interests as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, Jaksha. We all win when everyone plays fair! Google has a great team and they provide all the tools we need to succeed in honest marketing of our products, services or ideas, and I was pleased to see that they are looking out for my best interests as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Penalty from Google? by dzugg.com</title>
		<link>http://www.submitedge.com/news/new-penalty-from-google/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>dzugg.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.submitedge.com/news/?p=14#comment-5</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;New Penalty from Google?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Google penalties are mysterious to many, and website owners live in fear of seeing their rankings drop unannounced.The outcry in the past weeks over the supposed ‘-60’ penalty has triggered a fresh round of speculation and criticism for the network a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New Penalty from Google?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Google penalties are mysterious to many, and website owners live in fear of seeing their rankings drop unannounced.</p>
<p>The outcry in the past weeks over the supposed ‘-60’ penalty has triggered a fresh round of speculation and criticism for the network a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Penalty from Google? by pligg.com</title>
		<link>http://www.submitedge.com/news/new-penalty-from-google/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>pligg.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.submitedge.com/news/?p=14#comment-4</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;New Penalty from Google?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Google penalties are mysterious to many, and website owners live in fear of seeing their rankings drop unannounced.The outcry in the past weeks over the supposed ‘-60’ penalty has triggered a fresh round of speculation and criticism for the network a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New Penalty from Google?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Google penalties are mysterious to many, and website owners live in fear of seeing their rankings drop unannounced.</p>
<p>The outcry in the past weeks over the supposed ‘-60’ penalty has triggered a fresh round of speculation and criticism for the network a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Penalty from Google? by Jaksha Shah</title>
		<link>http://www.submitedge.com/news/new-penalty-from-google/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaksha Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 10:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.submitedge.com/news/?p=14#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Engineers of Google.com are very smart and if we play any trick to cheat google, it recognizes it and penalizes us. In my opinion they are following right strategy, to benefit the honest webmaster. To protect yourself being penalized, just don't try to cheat Google.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engineers of Google.com are very smart and if we play any trick to cheat google, it recognizes it and penalizes us. In my opinion they are following right strategy, to benefit the honest webmaster. To protect yourself being penalized, just don&#8217;t try to cheat Google.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
