Services Offered
- SEO Submission Services
- Directory Submission
- Article Submission
- Social Bookmarking
- Search Engine Submission
- Guaranteed Google Indexing
- DMOZ Listing
- Complete Link Building Solution
All in one Package - Guaranteed and Permanent Links from 400 Directories
- SEO Content writing
- Content Writing
- SEO Web Designing
- SEO Web Design

Everyone is an SEO these days. With the wide proliferation of information available to the ordinary Joe, every Tom, Dick and Harry now thinks they know how I should do my job.
Now, this is not going to be a rant. I have nothing against people named Joe, Tom, Dick or Harry. I heartily approve of people who try to educate themselves. I suppose my real problem is with the so called self proclaimed ‘gurus’ that have set themselves up as the be all and end all of knowledge.
I actually had a long time client come down on me the other day, and tell me that a friend of his who is an SEO ‘guru’ said that the articles on his site were keyword stuffed, and that he was probably going to be penalized by Google. My reaction was one of tired disgust.
The articles in question had the keyword phrase once in the title, once in the first paragraph, once in the body of the 500 word text, and once in the last paragraph. There were also two secondary phrases used once each. Total keyword density – way less than 2%, and nowhere near the eight to twenty that could conceivably trigger a penalty.
I of course tried to explain the fact to the client, who became defensive of the guru, and attempted again to ‘explain’ to me the best SEO doesn’t look like SEO, and that Google would penalize him for ‘stuffing’ if any keyword phrases was used more than three times – title, first paragraph and last paragraph.
He wants me to cut out the secondary phrases – which do include one word from the primary – as well as the middle primary phrase in the body of the text. Sure thing. Customer is always right and all that. But it’s sad to see someone actually take their site backward by going back to an outdated algorithm, just because the so-called ‘guru’ told him to.
Of course you want an article that isn’t contrived looking. I even went back and re-read the article in question to make sure all the keyword phrase inclusions flowed naturally – they did. You can’t put either a minimum or maximum number on the amount of keywords you should use, or even be too strict about how you space them out – the idea is for it to be natural.
That doesn’t mean you completely throw everything that has been learned about SEO out the window – search engines still have algorithms, and as long as they do, SEO will be necessary. I can’t help but think the new trend that says SEO should look natural then gives you a formula to make it look natural can’t be trusted.
Ditch the formulas – except the ones known to work and known to be necessary!! Yes, the best SEO doesn’t look like SEO – but using a keyword more than twice or three times in a 500 word article isn’t going to result in a Google penalty. I promise!
Leave a Comment
- Search Blog
Search:
- Categories
- Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- February 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007

